Rabble rouser Ken Ham and his biased Facebook fans

Creationist bloggers can be infuriating. If one has infuriated you by persisting in nonsense even when corrected, or refusing to reply to your criiticsm, you may feel driven to recording the fact. If so, you may register your disapproval here and hope a response is forthcoming.

Moderator: Moderators

Answers in Genesis - and science

Postby a_haworthroberts » Wed Feb 06, 2019 8:08 pm

https://answersingenesis.org/creationis ... ung-earth/
''Tell me please, what are the most compelling scientific evidences of a young earth?''

Will Tony be impressed with Terry's answer?

Will we ever find out?
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 8682
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Message as sent to Answers in Genesis

Postby a_haworthroberts » Sun Feb 10, 2019 7:14 pm

https://answersingenesis.org/homeschool ... textbooks/
''Unfortunately, the reality is that Christian curricula and colleges that teach a literal 6-day creation around 6,000 years ago are the exception, not the norm.''
That' s because both those things are false and the educators wish to inform rather than indoctrinate (whereas AiG prefer to indoctrinate - in home in settings where kids are isolated from their peers and less able to question what you people want them to accept uncritically). ''We are either for Christ or against him ...''. You people are both for Christ and lies and a fundamentalist 'worldview' invented by you and added to what the Bible actually says. You are (Christian) frauds and fakes.
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 8682
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Ken Ham's latest proof that the Bible is not infallible

Postby a_haworthroberts » Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:05 am

https://www.facebook.com/aigkenham/
''Here's another example of documented cancer in the fossil record supposedly millions of years old. This is a major problem for those Christians who believe in millions of years, as it means (for them) that cancer (disease) existed before sin.
There are many documented examples of various diseases in fossil bones supposedly millions of years old. But the Bible states clearly that before sin, God declared everything He created “very good” (Genesis 1:31). This would mean God calls cancer “very good.”
For those Christians who believe in millions of years, blaming disease and cancer on God and not our sin is to attack the character of our holy God. Also, allowing death, disease, and bloodshed before sin undermines the atonement and thus the gospel.
The Bible is clear--death, disease, and bloodshed in this world are the result of our sin. Romans chapter 8 explains that the whole world is groaning because of sin. Christians who believe in millions of years need to give up this terrible compromise belief:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/02 ... d-turtle''

Science has discovered the truth - and bigot Ken Ham hates that and so tries to lecture Christians that they should deny science by trying to frighten them that they are 'sinning against God' by accepting scientific reality.

As indeed I see the opening comment highlights. Namely ''It only provides a problem to those who buy into the entirely unscientific and unsupported supposition that the entire universe is only 6,000 years old.
To those of us with the ability to understand science and take it seriously, the existence of cancer (or anything else) in the fossil record doesn’t pose a problem.''

But Ken Ham will never get real. He's too full of pride and messianic zeal.

However 'biblical' timescales alone are NOT the truth of Earth history. We've known that for many many decades now.
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 8682
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

New AiG article

Postby a_haworthroberts » Sat Feb 16, 2019 9:14 pm

Message as sent:

https://answersingenesis.org/is-the-bib ... t-support/
''But we do not fear science because we know God’s Word is true ...''.
You people do indeed fear, and post falsehoods concerning, the international evidence-based scientific consensus. Starting with the Bible when discussing 'science' is NOT scientific it is RELIGIOUS.
''... we have seen time and time again that science ultimately confirms the Bible''. No you haven't. That is your religious delusion. When you put on so-called 'biblical glasses' and indulge in 'circular reasoning' - and demand that other Christians believe the same as you people (pseudo-science) about origins.
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 8682
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Previous

Return to Conversations with Creationists

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron