https://www.facebook.com/Piltdown.Superman/
''Radaractive: "More on Archaeopteryx and Evolution"
Although Archaeopteryx has been designated as a true bird, new technology was used to try to prove evolution by assuming evolution. That is neither logical not scientific.
http://radaractive.blogspot.com/2019/02 ... ion.html''
LIAR.
And it's no longer considered a bird either (as I have pointed out previously to YEC liars):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeopteryx
''Even evolutionists admit what creationists already said: Archaeopteryx is a true bird.'' LIAR. The new study in Historical Biology that is mentioned relates to just ONE Archaeopteryx fossil (one of at least eight apparently).
''... evolutionists have decided by fallaciously assuming evolution to prove evolution that there is evidence of bird evolution ... '' LIAR.
And the source for these falsehoods? The 'Institute for Creation Research':
https://www.icr.org/article/does-archae ... -evolution
The ICR cite this reference:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10. ... ode=ghbi20
The abstract states that eighth specimen of Archaeopteryx ''possesses a character suite that robustly constrains it as a basal avialan (primitive bird)'' and the paper designates the fossil a new species - Archaeopteryx albersdoerferi sp. nov. Whereas the original species, in the SAME genus (Archaeopteryx lithographica), is still classified as a bird-like DINOSAUR. A bird and a dinosaur in the SAME genus. Not obviously biblical.