Moderator: Moderators
a_haworthroberts wrote:https://stormbringer005.blogspot.com/2019/01/modern-creation-scientists-refuting-atheism-and-evolution.html
''I lack belief that those making such claims have done any investigation, preferring instead to use prejudicial conjecture, straw man arguments, and outright lying.''
If you are referring in part to myself, then you are LYING. I have spent literally YEARS investigating young earth creationist claims - including your claims.
Which lying would be of little surprise since this whole thread exposes much of your previous LYING.
Which not only includes false and misleading statements but also your repeated malicious accusations against me that I have been 'lying'. Because, despite my challenges that you 'score a goal' by proving me guilty of 'lying' as you have alleged, you have NEVER once actually demonstrated that I 'lie'.
Or - if you have and I somehow missed it - go ahead and prove it NOW (via email or on your own pages). But please remember that calling me a 'lying cyber stalker' or some such will NOT cut it (and would not stand up in court). I am NOT a 'lying cyber stalker' I am a TRUTHFUL and FACT-BASED user of social media and forums where I have REPEATEDLY proven, using specific detailed argumentation and logical analysis, that the person who makes dishonest false and malicious accusations online is NOT me. It is YOU Mr Sorensen.
''The view that someone must be an atheist or naturalist to be a scientist is false.'' My own opinion on that is that young earth creationists sometimes are real scientists. But they also lie about the meaning of evidence and/or put forward ideas that are against known scientific evidence.
a_haworthroberts wrote:http://radaractive.blogspot.com/2019/01/explosion-in-cambrian.html
''(If some tinhorn tells you that the Flood is fiction, he's lying, and that's a natural fact.)''
Oh no it isn't. The lie is what you just wrote.
Return to Conversations with Creationists
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests