http://www.piltdownsuperman.com/2017/11 ... truth.html"Another tactic, frequently observed in leftist news media, is to ignore inconvenient truths and pretend that they do not exist."
Such as? Do enlighten your followers (and us), Bob.
Meanwhile creationists and the right wing media frequently deny the findings of biology, geology, astronomy, climatology ...
Meanwhile this claim has just appeared, from TQEPD (I cannot corroborate it):
https://www.facebook.com/TQEPDebunked"You're hypocrites because you try to play the "Oh poor me, these atheists are attacking us with logic and reason" nonsense and try to rationalize it to yourselves by accusing us of trolling.
I was initially blocked from your page for a single post regarding the impossibility of the flood. If it really is a matter of us being ignorant trolls instead of you being a coward, feel free to come here any time and correct anything on this page.
Don't worry though, I don't expect you to have the courage to do that."
Despite TQEPD apparently failing to closely read all the YEC garbage that Bob posted re the Lost Squadron, Bob is STILL refusing to actually meaningfully debate with TQEPD.
Bob also is wailing on his Facebook page:
"Also, we're "hypocrites" because we won't let any wandering atheopath use the comments section as a personal latrine, but complain about the secular science system. Invalid comparison. They don't know logic or their own mythology, then wonder why we don't give them a forum. -CBB". He won't debate anyone on THEIR Facebook page, nor on THIS BCSE page which CHartsil also visits. And if he debated CHartsil on his OWN page, Bob would censor almost anything he wrote. Poor Bob, it just seems that he cannot cope with debating - ANY time, ANY place ...
I guess he will have to remain a lifelong coward (and post stuff like this knowing that I CAN'T correct his evil on his own page):
https://www.facebook.com/Piltdown.Superman/"Let's look at this example of logic and objectivity (snicker) in a different way. First, this owlhoot is whining that the author of a creationary post is a bigot, like the rest of us. I guess making a statement magically makes it a fact in Atheistland. Second, the author "won't listen".
Working backward, look at the comments area of the post and see who *really* will not listen and ignores the content of replies received in the interest of his hypocritical atheistic bigotry. (The old saying can be used here: explaining logic to a village atheist is like teaching a pig to sing, it wastes your time and annoys the pig.) The majority of the content of the article is ignored and waved off with what could be summed up as, "No it isn't! That's not true because evolution!""
Bob also links to this:
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogI ... 9478665113At that discussion I flagged to Steve on 21 October my post below.
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=3829&p=51695#p51695On 21 October I wrote here "[Sorensen] also tries to rabble rouse in a further comment:
"want to contact Steve Risner on this?" I've nothing to fear from that.
Well, if some of Sorensen's rabble do that I doubt that Steve is going to join in the bullying (even if his WW's sidekick Wolcott enjoys Class A bigotry AND attempted bullying - note his false allegation that in my comments I "never actually engaged the material much"):
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogI ... 9478665113I'll flag this post to Steve anyway."
I note that somewhat underhandedly, as recently as 2 November when I had long stopped viewing the page, Steve then replied to me at the WW's discussion:
"I'm not really sure what I'm supposed to gather from your link, Ashley. It's nice you're chatting about me and gossiping about me on the internet. That's super.
I note that you make grand claims when your opponent in debate is not present. Aside from that, I have no idea how to even navigate through the sludge on the other end of that link. It's cumbersome and hard to follow--choppy and references lots of other things that were allegedly said or done that I just don't have time to chase down.
I do think you mentioned the "Christians invented science" topic and, again, because you don't understand the topic or the point, you keep rambling about the Chinese and Muslims and their contributions to science. Lots of people from around the world have contributed to our knowledge base. But the scientific method was invented by a Christian in Europe and, for the 40th time, nearly every if not every major branch of science was founded by a Christian creationist. If you won't comment on that directly, don't comment on it. If you have evidence that suggests several major branches of science were, in fact, founded by someone other than creationists, I'll be happy to view it. If you have evidence that science and the way it is conducted in the modern world was not worked out by Christians, please show it. Otherwise, you've exposed yourself as unable to even participate in the conversation. You keep spewing out nonsense that has no connection to the topic at hand. In fact, you know what? Go to the "Creation Scientist Is Not An Oxymoron" post and comment there directly on what it says that is incorrect or that you have a different take on, please. It'll be easier to reference."
Steve needs to understand that Bob is not present here because he is a COWARD and also because I CAN'T (thanks to Bob) challenge him on his own page.
And I recall that I called Steve a bigot here on 19 October. That continues to look apt.
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=3829&p=51684&hilit=sheer#p51684