"This is a fundamentalist science rejecting cult.
Answers in Genesis. MISUSING and MISREPRESENTING the Bible. As a weapon to 'refute' science.
https://arkencounter.com/blog/2017/04/2 ... nceptions/'3 Ark Misconceptions'.
(1)
"Also, the world before Noah’s Flood probably didn’t have high mountains".
The Bible says NO such thing. It says at Genesis 8:4 (which one could reasonably assume is referring to mountains that already existed before Noah's Flood):
"... and on the seventeenth day of the seventh month the ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat".
This is after Genesis 7:17-20:
"For forty days the flood kept coming on the earth, and as the waters increased they lifted the ark high above the earth. The waters rose and increased greatly on the earth, and the ark floated on the surface of the water. They rose greatly on the earth, and all the high mountains under the entire heavens were covered. The waters rose and covered the mountains to a depth of more than fifteen cubits."
Where on earth does the Bible suggest or imply that before Noah's Flood there might not have been any 'high mountains'? Precisely nowhere. Or is the peak known as Mount Ararat. which reaches an altitude of 16,000 ft, 'not' high? No wonder people think many YECs are 'not of this world'. But they produce piles of unmitigated garbage that might help convert a few to Christianity but also cons millions (and helps part them from some of their money).
(2)
"Noah didn’t need two tigers, two lions, two leopards, and so on—he only needed two of the cat kind. In fact, Noah probably had fewer than 7,000 animals."
The Bible says NO such thing. It says at Genesis 6 19-20 (apparently referring to pairs of animals of the same species as we would now describe them ie pairs that could breed and produce viable offspring):
"You are to bring into the ark two of all living creatures, male and female, to keep them alive with you. Two of every kind of bird, of every kind of animal and of every kind of creature that moves along the ground will come to you to be kept alive."
One 'misconception' out of three is pretty poor going. Especially as the other two are misconceptions BY Answers in Genesis:
By the way, AiG have recently silently blocked me from the Ark Encounter and Creation Museum facebook pages. I wonder why (sort of)

I was combative at times but I was neither rude nor attacking Christianity in general nor wantonly abusive.
And the young earth creationist ignoramus Ray Comfort, a friend of AiG, also blatantly twists the Bible - to suit his agenda:
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=2967&start=1710 (post dated 28 April)
Comfort is claiming that "the book of Genesis says that every animal brings forth after its own kind". The full Comfort quote, at WND is:
"The Bible, on the other hand, passes the scientific method. The book of Genesis says that every animal brings forth after its own kind, and that there is male and female. We see that in the existing creation and in the fossil record. It passes the scientific test. Darwinian evolution doesn’t. It’s nothing but a fairytale for grown-ups. It’s unproven and unprovable, but it’s embraced by millions because it opens the door to the delightful pleasures of sin, as the Bible says ‘for a season'."
But what the Bible really says, during the creation account in Genesis 1, is "Let the earth bring forth living creatures after their kind: cattle and creeping things and beasts of the earth after their kind."
These people appear to have no conscience:
Many Christians are not like this and prefer truth to bigotry, dishonesty, and dogma."