Wider circulation email just now (minor typos now corrected):
"Lying is Evil Cowboy Bob. According to the Bible, liars get thrown into a lake of fire.
But that does not stop you from attacking me again because I defended myself by email against you lying. https://www.facebook.com/Piltdown.Superman
And that doesn't stop you lying about me at the ICR facebook page last week regarding something you wrote in a comment which you then pulled, totally ignoring my refutation of your accusation, and then pretending on your facebook hate page now that in my email above (also shown at the BCSE community forum) I changed the subject. Whereas what I did was:
(1) turn the subject back to what it was ORIGINALLY - the dishonesty of Brian Thomas here which you refuse to discuss because you cannot refute what I wrote:http://www.icr.org/article/8387
(2) respond to your Piltdown Superman blog post of 16 Nov where you wished to persuade your readers that my comments were just "unsubstantiated libellous raving" (you have NOT shown, because you CANNOT, that my comments that you linked to were anything other than a truthful attack exposing your hate and serial dishonesty). As I wrote at the ICR facebook page after Bob said that he had documented a 'lie' by myself ""Attacking over a perceived error like that is the intellectual equivalent of "typo pouncing" and smacks of desperation". From which I made the reasonable assumption that Bob was admitting that the photo at 'Piltdown Superman' indeed showed the wrong species of badger. However, now he is disgustingly accusing me of lying when everybody else - who is not insane or blind - can spot the difference." A 'typo' is an uncorrected MISTAKE. So is a wrong photograph when you are discussing a different sort of badger.
Bob should stop his pretence that I have 'lied' or else prove that I have.
But he will do NEITHER - because he is addicted to lying about anti-YECs he cannot deal with in a rational manner.
Only a hate-filled religious liar would call someone 'demonic' for speaking the truth. But I guess Sorensen is still angry and frustrated that he cannot refute what I wrote in the thread at the ICR facebook page (nor could the insane Smith who has just written: "That loser has been taking shots at me. I guess anyone who agrees with you or any other creationist about ANYTHING is a liar in his little mind. He probably won't see these comments, I think he got his facebook acct suspended again").
I have never had a facebook account suspended. Never.
But that won't stop Smith lying and hating - because I burst the ICR YEC lie bubble regarding the age of the universe. And I also exposed to people on the ICR facebook page that he seems to be impersonating on HIS facebook page a character from fiction:https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id ... 7&fref=ufihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Destroyer_(fiction
Others will now notice Bob's complete failure to address my points above.
But his overriding priority is to lie to his stupid fans about his critics, and portray himself as a wonderful Bible-based 'Christian' dogmatist who is being persecuted and stalked by lots of nasty critics of YEC pseudo-scientific garbage and wilful lying.
YEC John Heininger asked to unsubscribe from messages such as this one. Cowboy Bob did not.
PS at 2.28 am:
Liar Sorensen has just written on his facebook hate page:
"By the way, the narcissist knows full well that I blocked his e-mail. So he took out another account to continue harassing me and others. I blocked that too, which he also knows. So he continues to send e-mail to me. Diddly dur hay!"
No - as I have already explained, I took out a gmail account because I found O2 to be useless. Not because I needed a new way to 'harass' poor persecuted Bob.
And Bob does read some of my emails - because he REPLIED to one of them over the weekend (copied to others). His message? "The truth hurts, so you try to deny it. Thanks for the spam. Reported".
Your lies only fool other stupid or evil people, Bob.
I will continue to email YOU when I am talking about online rubbish YOU may publish. Whether you read it is up to you but it may not be in your interests not to.