http://crev.info/2013/10/lord-kelvin-ex ... mment-4989
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/0/24535331
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03fqdt6
I will try to catch up with this while it is still available on iplayer.
Ken Ham would call Kelvin a 'compromiser' if he was alive and held identical views today.
And Coppedge's claims in green are rather dubious. Though he does state "Evolutionists assume Kelvin’s arguments have been dismissed, but what do they do with the even more powerful evidence creationists offer today? They ignore it!" Once they have heard this 'evidence' the first time, yes they ignore it because it is religion not science.