jon_12091 wrote:Its seems to be about the philosphy of science, rather than practical science, and how you frame questions.
Christine Janis wrote:Hmm ---looked at this to see if there was any specific information about Tiktaalik to be discussed. Nothing but mental masturbation. Move along, nothing to see ----
a_haworthroberts wrote:NOTHING to do with Tiktaalik - but I've just posted the following comment at the most recent Eye on the ICR blog:
Will you be blogging on this - it raises interesting issues?
See also: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/341/6150/1055.summary
Tomkins refers to a footnote flagging a paper on the Arabidopsis plant and epigenetics - but there is NO such footnote.
There's also this: http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/09/ep ... 76551.html
Might Christine or others here also wish to comment?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests