macthornberg wrote:The bible is the source document. Concepts and ideas in it and the unerring undeviating belief it its authority are the bedrock to which all believers cling. So why isn't this absurd compendium, its origins and principles addressed/disassembled more directly by rationalists (like myself)? 66 writings assembled/filtered by the first council of Nicaea. The seed documents are the pentateuch. I believe; from these other concepts follow. All of this is the work of men believing in a sky daddy for their crops.
Believers:"the word of god". Is that because IT says so, or they do? I am definitely on the wrong planet. It's so basic an issue. If my chicken scratches, signed " this is the word of god" are found in 2000 years time, will I have started macthornbergism?
macthornberg wrote:The bible ... why isn't this absurd compendium, its origins and principles addressed/disassembled more directly by rationalists
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest