Steve Risner

Creationist bloggers can be infuriating. If one has infuriated you by persisting in nonsense even when corrected, or refusing to reply to your criiticsm, you may feel driven to recording the fact. If so, you may register your disapproval here and hope a response is forthcoming.

Moderator: Moderators

Steve Risner

Postby a_haworthroberts » Thu Oct 19, 2017 7:23 pm

What often happens when you try to debate a young earth creationist on his own blog page (a YEC and 'worldview warrior' who actually ALLOWS criticism to appear under his blog and doesn't BAN the critic):

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogI ... 9478665113
http://worldviewwarriors.blogspot.co.uk ... thing.html

At heart these people are sheer bigots. I'll let him have the last word. No - I don't wish to comment on his previous blog post. I've said my piece. He won't listen.
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 8164
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

PATHOLOGICAL LIAR Bob Sorensen

Postby a_haworthroberts » Sat Oct 21, 2017 8:33 pm

As shown here the evil fascist poked his nose in - and tried to PUT WORDS INTO MY MOUTH at https://www.facebook.com/Piltdown.Superman:
https://www.facebook.com/TQEPDebunked/?hc_location=ufi (The Question Evolution Project Debunked)
The bigot wrote in red ink "If you have the temerity to disagree with this guy, be prepared to be called 'fascist', 'bigot', 'science denier', and more. He even knows hearts & minds!"

NO, liar Sorensen (you also deliberately hid some of my words in the preceding post in this thread using a yellow horizontal line), I do NOT consider Risner a 'fascist'. I DO consider YOU a fascist though. This behaviour is further confirmation. I don't know the mind of Sorensen but I DO know that he is a rabid PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.

Unlike the fascist Sorensen (and as alluded to in his comment by TQEPD) Risner allows critical postings under his blogs (even if he totally ignores their content - which is why I called him a 'bigot', ONLY). By contrast, the fascist Sorensen usually deletes them and BANS the person making them (how cowardly).
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 8164
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

PATHOLOGICAL LIAR

Postby a_haworthroberts » Sat Oct 21, 2017 8:47 pm

Scrolling down I see Sorensen made ANOTHER post on the same topic (which is basically none of his business); I note that in the original post, which my preceding post reacted to, he accidentally FOULED UP:
"EDIT: I fouled up on this BIG TIME, and did not notice my error for several hours, after Likes and comments. Instead of highlighting text, I obliterated it. The corrected image is below.
Let's look at this example of logic and objectivity (snicker) in a different way. First, this owlhoot is whining that the author of a creationary post is a bigot, like the rest of us. I guess making a statement magically makes it a fact in Atheistland. Second, the author "won't listen".
Working backward, look at the comments area of the post and see who *really* will not listen and ignores the content of replies received in the interest of his hypocritical atheistic bigotry. (The old saying can be used here: explaining logic to a village atheist is like teaching a pig to sing, it wastes your time and annoys the pig.) The majority of the content of the article is ignored and waved off with what could be summed up as, "No it isn't! That's not true because evolution!"
You may get something useful out of the article itself, too.
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g
Main article, similar to some items we've shared:
http://worldviewwarriors.blogspot.co.uk/…/epigenetics-chang…
Source of the screenshot:
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=3829"

"Working backward, look at the comments area of the post and see who *really* will not listen and ignores the content of replies received in the interest of his hypocritical atheistic bigotry." It wasn't me. Check WHO refuses to research the topic of gene duplication. And check WHO did read the article that was requested of him but whose point about science done in the past by the Chinese and Muslims (and recently by fascist North Korea) was ignored.

Sorensen does not address a SINGLE sentence that I actually wrote under Risner's blog post. NOT ONE. He just attempts to bully me.

He also tries to rabble rouse in a further comment:
"want to contact Steve Risner on this?" I've nothing to fear from that.

Well, if some of Sorensen's rabble do that I doubt that Steve is going to join in the bullying (even if his WW's sidekick Wolcott enjoys Class A bigotry AND attempted bullying - note his false allegation that in my comments I "never actually engaged the material much"):
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogI ... 9478665113

I'll flag this post to Steve anyway.
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 8164
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom


Return to Conversations with Creationists

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron