I tried to comment here "Coulter is nuts. And dangerous."
https://theologyarchaeology.wordpress.c ... -in-brief/But - contrary to your recent statements here - you appear to be BLOCKING me (my post does not appear on-screen as awaiting moderation - instead I am being fobbed off by being asked for personal details that I have already supplied: "ERROR: please fill the required fields (name, email)."
By the way the reality-denier Tee quote mined me (as well as either censoring ie falsely editing parts of my comments or else hiding them in their entirety) here:
https://theologyarchaeology.wordpress.c ... e/#respondAs I reported in full on my Facebook page on 1 November 2016. I quote my words at the time: "I'm being QUOTE-MINED by a creationist blogger. Yes, REALLY: I just made two responses, as shown below:
"You have QUOTE-MINED me you liar. This is what I wrote (I told another person AT THE TIME by an email which I have saved and which I am now sharing more widely):
"
https://theologyarchaeology.wordpress.c ... e/#respond"Could the moon be younger than most people realise?" NO. Unlike the honest looking folks at Christian News, you are a bigoted fool. READ the ABSTRACT of the paper: "We also observe a secondary cratering process that we estimate churns the top two centimetres of regolith on a timescale of 81,000 years-more than a hundred times faster than previous models estimated from meteoritic impacts (ten million years)." TOP TWO CENTIMETRES. Not WHOLE SATELLITE."
I commented on the news report, LIAR 'Tee'.
I am sending a wide circulation email exposing your behaviour (if you provide your email address to [my email address] I will copy you in). Attached will be a photo of this page as I submit this comment (which you will of course censor because you are a reality denial lying bigot for Jesus, whether he wants you behaving like that or not).
You are a liar. No wonder you are voting for Trump as you also made clear on 28 October. Only fascists and fools are voting for Trump.
He is evil (and not Christian). You are evil (and claiming to be Christian)."
Followed by:
"Although your words - including "Could the moon be younger than most realize?" - were in fact taken directly from the Christian News article, you also quoted the article SELECTIVELY. It also stated (among other things): "Because crater-counting is one way to estimate the age of a planetary surface, astronomers say that they will need to revisit their dating estimates of the moon’s surface" and "Not only does this study invalidate the idea that craters only form over long eras, but the research suggests that these regular impacts could completely alter the surface of the moon within a timescale of thousands—not millions—of years." (Yes - 81,000 years, not 6,000 or less.)
I now realise your reply was referring to what you did rather than what I did. So you DIDN'T in fact comment on the news report. But you DID quote from it selectively, probably in an attempt to mislead. (And you censored most of my comment instead of addressing it, which suggests a deliberate attempt to mislead rather than mere incompetence or 'rushing').
The story is not about the moon's formation or the moon's age. It's about the lunar surface.
Parts of the Christian News report also seek to mislead by the way. You have to get to the 'small print' to realise that this is NOT about a 'young' or 'younger' moon. Many readers would fail to see the wood for the trees because of deceptive comments made quoting YEC physicist Jason Lisle (described as a 'Christian' scientist):
"Six thousand years ago, the moon would have been about 800 feet (250 m) closer to the earth (which is not much of a change considering the moon is nearly a quarter of a million miles, or 400,000 km, away),” and “So this ‘spiraling away’ of the moon is not a problem over the biblical time scale of 6,000 years, but if the earth and moon were over 4,000,000,000 years old (as big-bang supporters teach), then we would have big problems,” and “This is because the moon would have been so close that it would actually have been touching the earth less than 1.5 billion years ago. This suggests that the moon can’t possibly be as old as secular astronomers claim.” Scientists neither claim that the moon was formed at the immediate same time as the Earth nor that it was once almost 'touching' the Earth. They believe that a collision between Earth and another planetesimal formed the moon and also that recession rates have been increasing over time.""
The polite (or pompous?) fraud and hypocrite 'Tee' twisted my first response into:
"
https://theologyarchaeology.wordpress.c ... e/#respond“Could the moon be younger than most people realise?” NO."
(and then pretended to 'rebut' a bastardised version of what I ACTUALLY wrote - which of course he will FAIL to rebut here either)
The science hater 'Tee' is also whinging on his current blog "We are tired of these attacks upon a man who has held office for only 1 month." Well, here's another one. Trump is a science rejecting pathologically lying anti-democratic narcissist. Clinton is not perfect but looks like a saint in comparison. Unlike YEC Christians - who look like unrepenting endlessly lying and deceiving sinners - not saints.
But carry on posting here you proven fraud. You are not banned. You might wish to incriminate yourself further ...