IssacBourne wrote:Now let's do some math.
There are 8.7 million species on this planet. There have been around 250,000 fossils found. That is less than 3% of the story and evidence. Which brings up a few questions and realizations.
1) How does a theory become a true proven fact with less than 3% of the evidence?
2) How does a theory become a scientific one with less than 3% of the evidence?
3) What was the 123 criteria that allowed a theory become become a scientific one with less that 3% of the evidence?
4) And is 3% of the evidence "mountains of evidence" you speak of? I don't think so.
Observable evolution in action.
Out of all the evolution that is claimed to have happened, and was supposedly recorded in the fossil record. How much of it is actually observable without a time machine? Less then 1%. Which means the same question above apply as to why less than 1% observable equals all the things claimed about it?
You can tell people what you like. I shall tell you exactly what happened. I moved your thread to this sub-forum where it belonged. In doing so I neglected to un-tick the "leave a shadow" box and as a result the first three posts in the the thread remained in the Free for All subforum. I started to delete these posts - which I expected to remain visible in CwC - and found that there was in fact only one instance of the posts on the forum and that I had deleted your main post. I'm sorry about that, it was not my intention, but I am surprised that as an experienced site owner and forum admin you did not keep a copy of such a long, elaborately illustrated post.IssacBourne wrote:Never mind. I can tell by your attitude and yous so called mistaken delete of my post that all your are going to do is give me trouble, Everyone warned me I should have listened. I don't have a copy of that post neither am I going to retype trying to remember what I said. You deleted it on purpose and that is exactly what I am going to tell everyone.
There are 8.7 million species on this planet. There have been around 250,000 fossils found. That is less than 3% of the story and evidence....
Just to put the record straight, as soon as I realised my mistake I pm'd Bourne to apologise and invite him to repost. This was before I repeated the message on the forum. I never got a reply.a_haworthroberts wrote:PPS I now see - at 1.16 am on 3.1.15 and just after sending my email - that Bourne HAS in fact acknowledged on his facebook page Brian's post at 3.15 pm above (when I looked earlier I could not see any such acknowledgement). However, all Bourne writes is "Ah yes, the attempted apology. After everything said and done. The admin can;t do this in public would not want your buds to see it. Showing a YEC mercy has to be done in private. Time stamp is after the fact not before. And since all things happened in the public part the apology should have been in public as well. ~ Issac".
Bourne must be pretty thick if he thinks Brian's post at 3.15 pm was purely 'private'. His response is an insincere one. If he was confident in his views he would put the events of 2 January behind him and continue debating. That's what 'evolutionists' tend to do if they go to YEC forums or pages. (He may also have received a private apology from Brian for all I know, but the BCSE forum post by Brian at 3.15 pm - after Bourne said that he was going to accuse Brian of lying to him - was PUBLIC. In fact I've just seen that it was Brian's community forum post of 6.41 am on 2 January!) As I wrote in my email a few minutes' ago: "Why do online young Earth creationists assume that everybody else is stupid? Is it because they find that their own followers frequently are?"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests