YEC Bob Sorensen - compulsive liar exposed

Creationist bloggers can be infuriating. If one has infuriated you by persisting in nonsense even when corrected, or refusing to reply to your criiticsm, you may feel driven to recording the fact. If so, you may register your disapproval here and hope a response is forthcoming.

Moderator: Moderators

Re: YEC Bob Sorensen - timeline

Postby a_haworthroberts » Wed Dec 04, 2013 8:32 pm

https://www.facebook.com/Piltdown.Superman
The 'Question Evolution' Project - a cluster of arrogant BIGOTS. As today's comments there amply confirms. They do NOT tolerate ANY disagreement with their false allegations against people who are of a different opinion to them. They do not have the courage to let others read what they say they banned a person for - and they also boast about how many people they ban.
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 9053
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: YEC Bob Sorensen - timeline

Postby a_haworthroberts » Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:12 pm

We've had THIS unpleasant and frankly unchristian whinging podcast from Sorensen today:
http://www.piltdownsuperman.com/2013/12 ... llacy.html

What we have NOT had today is an answer to my QUESTION here (after I emailed Bob and the Christian blogger Joel):
http://thenaturalhistorian.com/2013/12/ ... /#comments (last two comments at the time of writing)

I cannot understand how any rational person would accept the bogus arguments and libel of unnamed critics in podcasts such as this. But perhaps most of those who listen to this rubbish are irrational people. By the way, I STILL don't know what this 'genetic fallacy' is since the whinger fails to explain what on earth he is actually supposed to be on about and certainly does not discuss genetics.

PS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_fallacy
Ah, I see. The genetic fallacy is NOT a fallacy about genetics. What a fool for making such an irrational assumption.

He's about as close to a POE as a serious YEC ideologue could possibly get. Making noisy propaganda videos railing against 'propaganda'. 16 unnamed bigots say they 'like' it.
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 9053
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: YEC Bob Sorensen - timeline

Postby InfernalTank » Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:29 am

InfernalTank
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 1:51 am

Bob the Cowboy Builder

Postby a_haworthroberts » Mon Dec 16, 2013 2:01 am

Look like Bob the Cowboy Builder (why didn't I think of that before?) commented belatedly here in the hope that I would not see his unpleasantness. Well, I HAVE seen it:

http://gracesalt.wordpress.com/2013/12/ ... omment-368
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 9053
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: YEC Bob Sorensen - timeline

Postby a_haworthroberts » Mon Dec 16, 2013 2:44 pm

http://www.piltdownsuperman.com/2013/12 ... itful.html
Bob is not a poe
Bob is not a poe
Bob is not a poe...
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 9053
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: YEC Bob Sorensen - timeline

Postby a_haworthroberts » Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:55 pm

http://www.piltdownsuperman.com/2013/12 ... ience.html
"Creationists do not need to resort to desperation or fabrication to fool people because science supports creation, not evolution".

SO WHY DO THEY DO IT THEN? WHY IS IT APPARENTLY NECESSARY? ANY WHY ARE YEC ATTEMPTS TO RUBBISH THE THEORIES OF EVOLUTIONISTS SO FEEBLE THAT THEY CANNOT GET THEM PUBLISHED IN MAINSTREAM SCIENCE JOURNALS?

Jason Lisle and Sirius Knott - note the reification in "science supports"!!
Naughty, naughty.

Perhaps Cowboy Bob and David Coppedge should blog about the lack of desperation and fabrication at the Creation Museum? I look forward to that.
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 9053
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re:

Postby a_haworthroberts » Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:16 am

Found on the Atheism on the Slide Facebook page:
"About
Refuting the rantings of modern obstreperous militant fundamentalist atheists.
Description
Modern atheism is on the slide, the truth of Christianity is gaining ground. No amount of whining and denial will change the facts. Atheism is intellectually, morally and philosophically untenable. Modern militant atheists are a small minority, but big on noise. They are an embarrassment to atheists who want to remain civil and go on about their business.
Atheist hypocrisy has tens of thousands of pages ridiculing God, the Bible, Christians and so forth. But if anyone even DARES to question the intelligence, integrity or sanity of modern recalcitrant atheists, watch out! The excrement strikes the bladed cooling device. And boy, they stink at taking a joke!
Blasphemy, taking God's name in vain, excessive profanity will get you booted. This is not a democracy. Admins can admonish users, delete comments, ban users and so forth as they see fit. Or they may let trolls humiliate themselves before dropping the banhammer. Some people will be banned simply because we do not like them, or they have obscene names. Maybe. Arbitrary? Capricious? You betcha!
Sincerely Yours,
Snigglefritz"

Not all US Christians show that amount of 'Peace' and 'Love', of course. So why are those nasty US atheists so vociferous and intolerant? Perhaps it's because the fundamentalists - including the science-hating and atheist-hating young Earth creationists - are so NOISY?
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 9053
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: YEC Bob Sorensen - timeline

Postby a_haworthroberts » Sun Dec 22, 2013 11:50 pm

Dated 22.12.13 - a lesson in how to be a science-hating bigot.

http://gracesalt.wordpress.com/2013/12/ ... /#comments
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 9053
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

YEC Bob Sorensen - hypocritical Christian

Postby a_haworthroberts » Mon Dec 23, 2013 7:20 pm

Sorensen TODAY:
Condemning hypothetical people for a logical fallacy in saying "science corrects itself".
http://www.piltdownsuperman.com/2013/12 ... ought.html

Sorensen on 17 Dec 2013:
Committing the very same logical fallacy he today condemns when lying that "science supports creation, not evolution".
http://www.piltdownsuperman.com/2013/12 ... ience.html

By his hypocritical behaviour Sorensen is an able recruiting sergeant for atheism and religious scepticism.
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 9053
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: YEC Bob Sorensen - timeline

Postby a_haworthroberts » Fri Dec 27, 2013 7:18 pm

Bob Sorensen is NOT, I repeat NOT a Poe. He really IS like this. He really detests 'evolutionists'. And really is full of hot air and unsupported allegations.

http://www.piltdownsuperman.com/2013/12 ... usion.html
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 9053
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: YEC Bob Sorensen - timeline

Postby a_haworthroberts » Fri Dec 27, 2013 8:23 pm

In his article touted by the unscientific Sorensen Tomkins claims:
"In 2002, 614,000 bases of DNA surrounding the fusion site were fully sequenced, revealing that the alleged fusion sequence was in the middle of a gene originally classified as a pseudogene because there was not yet any known function for it".

These are the references he cites (I had to search for them):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12421752
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12421751

There is rather sparse mention of pseudogenes in these Abstracts!

Sorensen appears to assume that Tomkins is arguing that there was no human chromosome 2 fusion because the site was originally - possibly wrongly - classed as a 'pseudogene'.

Is this correct?

Well I'm no geneticist but I've just read the Tomkins article (Sorensen accuses critics of NOT reading articles but I DO read anything I criticise).

It's a bit MORE complicated than Sorensen's brain - and, he hopes, the brains of his readers - appear capable of taking on board. I quote Tomkins:

"My analysis confirms that the site is located inside a gene called DDX11L2 on human chromosome 2. Furthermore, the alleged fusion sequence contains a functional genetic feature called a “transcription factor binding site” that is located in the first intron (non-coding region) of the gene (see illustration). Transcription factors are proteins that bind to regulatory sites in and around genes to control their function, acting like switches. The DDX11L2 gene has three of these areas, one of which is encoded in the alleged fusion site.
Chromosomes are double-stranded DNA molecules and contain genes on both strands that are encoded in opposite directions. Because the DDX11L2 gene is encoded on the reverse-oriented strand, it is read in the reverse direction (see Exon 1 arrow). Thus, the alleged fusion sequence is not read in the forward orientation typically used in literature as evidence for a fusion—rather, it is read in the reverse direction and encodes a key regulatory switch.
The supposed fusion site is actually a key part of the DDX11L2 gene. The gene itself is part of a complex group of RNA helicase DDX11L genes that produce regulatory long non-coding RNAs. These DDX11L2 RNA transcripts are produced in at least 255 different cell types and tissues in humans, highlighting the genes’ ubiquitous biological function.
Functional genes like DDX11L2 do not arise by the mythical fusing of telomeres. The alleged fusion site is not a degenerate fusion sequence but is and, since creation, has been a functional feature in an important gene."

The good news is that I won't be testing anyone, including myself, on this non peer-reviewed hypothesis.
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 9053
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re:

Postby a_haworthroberts » Sun Dec 29, 2013 8:49 pm

As posted by some unnamed person at 'The Question Evolution Project'.

"From Creation Moments: Some Dinosaurs Ate Grass!
Job 40:15
“Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox.”
The Genesis creation account tells us that in the perfect world that God created there was no death. This means that there were no predators. In fact, Genesis 1:30 specifically states that God gave all the beasts and birds every green herb for food. And, yes, this would include all the dinosaurs. Some discoveries made in 2005 now add strong scientific evidence to support the Genesis account that in the beginning all the beasts ate the green herbs for food.
Of course, evolutionists found great amusement in these Bible claims since even plant-eating dinosaurs didn’t have the right kind of teeth to eat, say, grass. And besides, they said, grass did not evolve until long after the dinosaurs were extinct. Scientists from India’s Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotony examined fossilized sauropod droppings to see what they were eating. Common in such droppings are bits of silica called phytoliths. These bits of silica were the remains of the plants eaten by those dinosaurs and are unique to each species of plant. To the surprise of the entire scientific community, the phytoliths were made by grasses, including relatives of rice, bamboo and forage grasses.
It is now unquestionably clear that grasses did exist when the dinosaurs lived and that the sauropods ate grass. On this fact, the Bible was right all along, and evolutionary science was wrong.
Source: http://www.creationmoments.com/radio/tr ... -ate-grass
Picture: http://imageafter.com/image.php?image=b21bozzit122.jpg"


Some sauropods ate grass (and thus behemoth was a dinosaur - duh).

Well done Mr QEP (and Creation Moments whoever HE is) for finding ONE fact that evolutionary scientists now accept based on available evidence and which also does not contradict the Bible! You have GREAT faith that one fact apparently trumps all the many that evolutionists have discovered and which flatly go against the Bible (read as infallible and scientifically accurate 'history').
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 9053
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: YEC Bob Sorensen - timeline

Postby a_haworthroberts » Mon Dec 30, 2013 6:55 pm

Who can Bob the Cowboy possibly be talking about today?!
http://www.piltdownsuperman.com/2013/12 ... -time.html
"... they hide evidence, make excuses, ignore conflicting data, proceed from presuppositions, conduct bad science (including outright fraud) and more...".
Yes it's the young Earth creationists - not. Because he IS one.
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 9053
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: YEC Bob Sorensen - timeline

Postby a_haworthroberts » Wed Jan 01, 2014 6:44 pm

http://www.piltdownsuperman.com/2014/01 ... nning.html
Science is 'great' but evolution is a 'cancer'. Happy new year from the bigot.
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 9053
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: YEC Bob Sorensen - timeline

Postby a_haworthroberts » Thu Jan 02, 2014 6:18 pm

a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 9053
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

PreviousNext

Return to Conversations with Creationists

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests