Christians and science

All are welcome to this forum, which is for debating the teaching of creationism or intelligent design in schools. This forum can be boisterous, and you should not participate if easily offended.

Moderator: Moderators

Christians and science

Postby a_haworthroberts » Mon Jun 25, 2018 11:36 pm

This seems pretty innocuous: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed ... tians-rjs/

But AiG wanted to discuss it: https://answersingenesis.org/what-is-sc ... hristians/

YECs have got 'science' don't you know.

Jeanson suggests, without backing up the claim, that RJS doesn’t seem to be familiar with the long history of creation science (and its output of publications).

But is that true? http://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed ... t-yec-rjs/

Jeanson carries on: "Does RJS truly understand the evidence proffered by YEC scientists? The absence of references in RJS’s article is telling." A reference or two might have been helpful I agree. Just making assertions gives the YECs ammunition.

And yet again Jeanson takes aim at Joel Duff, accusing him of 'poor scholarship'.

And Duff hasn't reviewed Jeanson's new book - while RJS either hasn't heard of it or is perhaps pretending that he hasn't?

I found an online review that is underway (not read) by an unnamed graduate student blogger:
https://evograd.wordpress.com/2017/10/1 ... roduction/
https://evograd.wordpress.com/
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 8595
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Christians and science

Postby a_haworthroberts » Thu Jun 28, 2018 11:06 pm

a_haworthroberts wrote:This seems pretty innocuous: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed ... tians-rjs/

But AiG wanted to discuss it: https://answersingenesis.org/what-is-sc ... hristians/

YECs have got 'science' don't you know.

Jeanson suggests, without backing up the claim, that RJS doesn’t seem to be familiar with the long history of creation science (and its output of publications).

But is that true? http://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed ... t-yec-rjs/

Jeanson carries on: "Does RJS truly understand the evidence proffered by YEC scientists? The absence of references in RJS’s article is telling." A reference or two might have been helpful I agree. Just making assertions gives the YECs ammunition.

And yet again Jeanson takes aim at Joel Duff, accusing him of 'poor scholarship'.

And Duff hasn't reviewed Jeanson's new book - while RJS either hasn't heard of it or is perhaps pretending that he hasn't?

I found an online review that is underway (not read) by an unnamed graduate student blogger:
https://evograd.wordpress.com/2017/10/1 ... roduction/
https://evograd.wordpress.com/



https://www.facebook.com/Piltdown.Superman/
I see that nazi liar Curtis Long is spreading poison on Facebook again: "Hitler-Robbers is furious that this article even exists! As usual, he misrepresented it." Notice how the evil bastard fails even to link to my post - he misrepresents me. HYPOCRITE.

If Christianity is true people will be in hell because of these people.

Assuming they actually belong to a church, does their pastor know how they carry on I wonder.

They will never ever repent of their lying and hating.
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 8595
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Christians and science

Postby a_haworthroberts » Sun Jul 01, 2018 10:59 pm

a_haworthroberts wrote:
a_haworthroberts wrote:This seems pretty innocuous: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed ... tians-rjs/

But AiG wanted to discuss it: https://answersingenesis.org/what-is-sc ... hristians/

YECs have got 'science' don't you know.

Jeanson suggests, without backing up the claim, that RJS doesn’t seem to be familiar with the long history of creation science (and its output of publications).

But is that true? http://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed ... t-yec-rjs/

Jeanson carries on: "Does RJS truly understand the evidence proffered by YEC scientists? The absence of references in RJS’s article is telling." A reference or two might have been helpful I agree. Just making assertions gives the YECs ammunition.

And yet again Jeanson takes aim at Joel Duff, accusing him of 'poor scholarship'.

And Duff hasn't reviewed Jeanson's new book - while RJS either hasn't heard of it or is perhaps pretending that he hasn't?

I found an online review that is underway (not read) by an unnamed graduate student blogger:
https://evograd.wordpress.com/2017/10/1 ... roduction/
https://evograd.wordpress.com/



https://www.facebook.com/Piltdown.Superman/
I see that nazi liar Curtis Long is spreading poison on Facebook again: "Hitler-Robbers is furious that this article even exists! As usual, he misrepresented it." Notice how the evil bastard fails even to link to my post - he misrepresents me. HYPOCRITE.

If Christianity is true people will be in hell because of these people.

Assuming they actually belong to a church, does their pastor know how they carry on I wonder.

They will never ever repent of their lying and hating.




And just to prove me right that Sorensen is an evil hypocrite, he's reacted (at the start of this weekend) to my post with this piece of childish malice:
''He's fuming, and hypocritically misrepresenting both of us. Also, he was not directly named, but seeks out things to complain about to boost his ego. -CBB''.

Even if young earth creationism was scientifically plausible, I would probably reject it because almost all those who peddle it are filled with hatred, dishonesty and bigotry.

People will be in hell because they wrongly assume all 'Christians' are like these lying bigots - and so dismiss Christianity.

And they don't care. If they did they would behave like the Bible (New Testament) says Christians should behave.

The shit says I 'misrepresented' him. Where, liar? I never even mentioned you in the original post.

And then I accurately DESCRIBED you and your gang.
a_haworthroberts
 
Posts: 8595
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:49 am
Location: United Kingdom


Return to Free For All

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

cron