It's 'not' science

[a_haworthroberts]

https://isgenesishistory.com/time-matte ... ns-debate/
"But isn’t deep time proven beyond a doubt?
No, it cannot be proven because it is an historical assumption—a paradigm—that precedes the interpretation of data."

So. It's 'not' science. (Even though radiometric dates way older than 6,000 years are calculated using mathematics.) It's all just a 'paradigm'. And a 6,000 year old Earth and universe remains on the table - just like the Bible says (sort of).

So don't worry about asteroid Oumuamua, Thomas ...