Moderator: Moderators
The problem is, I'm not going to allow him to use my blog as his litter box.(Then again, this is not your problem.) However, if you don't want us to have a formal debate here then I suppose Ashley and I will have to find a different venue if he accepts my challenge. If mudslinging is your concern then you have no need to be concerned.(I don't plan on compounding his childish behavior with more childish behavior.) I am interesting in a formal, civil, written debate, not a mud slinging match. Either way it's your choice. Thanks Brian.Brian Jordan wrote:MOD NOTE
Maybe we should leave Ashley and Jason to slug it out on their own. Preferably on Jason's blog.
Why? Because (and here I speak for myself, not the BCSE) this forum is not here as a post-box for your missives to sundry creationists with whom you are having personal disagreements. An occasional snipe is one thing, but an endless tirade is boring in the extreme and does nobody any good. I suggested that people left you and Jason to yourselves in the hope that it would be an end of the matter, not with a view to censoring their terminology. (Though I might wish people were a bit more polite.) I suggested having your debate on Jason's blog because he invited you to do it there and we've already seen your opinion of him and his ideas - not to mention your refutation of everything he has to say.a_haworthroberts wrote:Brian Jordan wrote:MOD NOTE
Maybe we should leave Ashley and Jason to slug it out on their own. Preferably on Jason's blog.
WHY?!
Your comment is totally ignorant and foolish, Brian. I thought better of you.
Jason STARTED all this not ME. I have exposed his dishonesty. THAT is what this website is ABOUT!!
I CANNOT 'slug it out' on his website because he CENSORS me. I have NO option but to reproduce the censored comments HERE (where HE is free to address them but has NOT done so, thus we are NOT 'slugging it out' here).
Do you not UNDERSTAND?!
Your ignorant, ill-thought out, comment plays RIGHT INTO HIS HANDS.
By the way, Petersen is no better than Sorensen - and Peter H and other people have joined in the discussion on THAT thread.
If you hide my posts I will certainly protest. I thought this website was about free speech as far as possible?!
Your comment suggests otherwise (yet Roger tells someone to put their head in a bucket of ***t and you say NOTHING).
If Ashley can not find another comfortable venue for a debate then it looks like I will have no choice but to host it on my blog, should he accept. Thanks again Brian.Brian Jordan wrote:Why? Because (and here I speak for myself, not the BCSE) this forum is not here as a post-box for your missives to sundry creationists with whom you are having personal disagreements. An occasional snipe is one thing, but an endless tirade is boring in the extreme and does nobody any good. I suggested that people left you and Jason to yourselves in the hope that it would be an end of the matter, not with a view to censoring their terminology. (Though I might wish people were a bit more polite.) I suggested having your debate on Jason's blog because he invited you to do it there and we've already seen your opinion of him and his ideas - not to mention your refutation of everything he has to say.a_haworthroberts wrote:Brian Jordan wrote:MOD NOTE
Maybe we should leave Ashley and Jason to slug it out on their own. Preferably on Jason's blog.
WHY?!
Your comment is totally ignorant and foolish, Brian. I thought better of you.
Jason STARTED all this not ME. I have exposed his dishonesty. THAT is what this website is ABOUT!!
I CANNOT 'slug it out' on his website because he CENSORS me. I have NO option but to reproduce the censored comments HERE (where HE is free to address them but has NOT done so, thus we are NOT 'slugging it out' here).
Do you not UNDERSTAND?!
Your ignorant, ill-thought out, comment plays RIGHT INTO HIS HANDS.
By the way, Petersen is no better than Sorensen - and Peter H and other people have joined in the discussion on THAT thread.
If you hide my posts I will certainly protest. I thought this website was about free speech as far as possible?!
Your comment suggests otherwise (yet Roger tells someone to put their head in a bucket of ***t and you say NOTHING).
So I suggest you calm down and concentrate more on the quality of your posts than the overwhelming quantity of them.
Goodnight and sleep well.
Answersforhope wrote:The problem is, I'm not going to allow him to use my blog as his litter box.(Then again, this is not your problem.) However, if you don't want us to have a formal debate here then I suppose Ashley and I will have to find a different venue if he accepts my challenge. If mudslinging is your concern then you have no need to be concerned.(I don't plan on compounding his childish behavior with more childish behavior.) I am interesting in a formal, civil, written debate, not a mud slinging match. Either way it's your choice. Thanks Brian.Brian Jordan wrote:MOD NOTE
Maybe we should leave Ashley and Jason to slug it out on their own. Preferably on Jason's blog.
I'd also like to note that I have not received notification on whether or not Ashley accepts my challenge.
Are you declining my challenge?a_haworthroberts wrote:Answersforhope wrote:The problem is, I'm not going to allow him to use my blog as his litter box.(Then again, this is not your problem.) However, if you don't want us to have a formal debate here then I suppose Ashley and I will have to find a different venue if he accepts my challenge. If mudslinging is your concern then you have no need to be concerned.(I don't plan on compounding his childish behavior with more childish behavior.) I am interesting in a formal, civil, written debate, not a mud slinging match. Either way it's your choice. Thanks Brian.Brian Jordan wrote:MOD NOTE
Maybe we should leave Ashley and Jason to slug it out on their own. Preferably on Jason's blog.
I'd also like to note that I have not received notification on whether or not Ashley accepts my challenge.
The mud I sling towards you is sadly necessary, Jason.
I do not make things up nor do I hide anything. I cannot say the same for you. That is what this is about,
http://answersforhope.com/why-i-stop-at ... ting-here/ (banned from making meaningful responses)
http://answersforhope.com/god-answers-p ... ange-ways/ (banned from making meaningful responses)
http://answersforhope.com/a-challenge-f ... h-roberts/ (banned from making meaningful responses)
mathunt wrote:Ashley, if I can make a suggestion. If you do debate him then make sure it is about a scientific subject as science is Petersens weak point.
Return to Conversations with Creationists
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests